ralentina rated The Omnivore's Dilemma: 3 stars

The Omnivore's Dilemma by Michael Pollan
What should we have for dinner? For omnivore's like ourselves, this simple question has always posed a dilemma: When you …
This link opens in a pop-up window
What should we have for dinner? For omnivore's like ourselves, this simple question has always posed a dilemma: When you …
I 'picked up' this book by chance, while sleep-deprived and in need of something to read to fill the remaining 9 hours of my layover. I was not expecting to like it - in fact, I expecting nothing at all, because I didn't know what it was about. It was such an intense experience. The Year of Magical Thinking describes the year following the death of Joan Didion's husband (and her daughter falling very, very ill). It gives the impression of having been written in a state of confusion, and pain. Well, it clearly was. It is raw, and yet beautifully written. It is stuffed with random quotes on grief, from poetry, and novels, and academic studies - and yet it does not get boring. There is no room for boredom, because this account of love, and sudden death, and loss of love, and loss of meaning, is so alive.
Content warning Medium spoilers!
The narrator of the book is a Black woman in the UK who, through sacrifice and hard work, has managed to climb the social ladder and now has a relatively prestigious, high-paying corporate job. She also has a posh white boyfriend with vaguely progressive political views. In other words she is, by all society standards, very successful. She is also deeply bitter and unhappy, seemingly because she is at all juncture told that, as a Black woman, she doesn't belong and doesn't deserve what she has [I say 'seemingly' because I believe corporate jobs and posh boyfriend make all kind of people miserable]. When she receives a cancer diagnosis, she almost welcomes it as way out of the life she has constructed for herself.
The book is written in a spare, cold style, essentially as a series of vignettes that explore her feelings and thoughts in various professional and social situations. It works to create a sense of dissociation, which seems to be what the narrator is also experiencing.
I have been thinking about why I feel some sort of antipathy towards her. One explanation could be that I feel defensive and judged by the character, aka plain white fragility. Another is that she is supposed to evoke these feelings because she is ultimately a very flawed person who came to 'play the game' and to some extent even 'think the thoughts' of the white upper middle-classes and elites that surround her: she thinks she deserves her job (which she does in as far as she's capable, but that is not the problem with meritocracy), and she's envious of other people money even though she's objectively well-off. Most likely it's a bit of both.
Winds documents in a well-research and accessible ways how Israeli universities are complicit in the Occupation, oppression and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. The first chapter demonstrates how specific disciplines, such as archeology, legal studies and Middle East studies, are almost entirely in service of justifying and upholding the Israeli political order. Next, Wind turns to how university campuses are used to physically establish a presence and take over Palestinian land. The third chapter looks at direct collaborations between the state, the industrial military complex, and universities, considering scholars involvement in the development of new weapons, propaganda and military training, among other. The forth chapter explains how Israeli universities represses the academic freedom of Palestinian and anti-Zionist Israeli academic, essentially banning them from researching and speaking about some topics, e.g. the Nakba. The fifth chapter is an account of the ways Israel sought to prevent and regulate Palestinian access to higher …
Winds documents in a well-research and accessible ways how Israeli universities are complicit in the Occupation, oppression and ethnic cleansing of Palestinians. The first chapter demonstrates how specific disciplines, such as archeology, legal studies and Middle East studies, are almost entirely in service of justifying and upholding the Israeli political order. Next, Wind turns to how university campuses are used to physically establish a presence and take over Palestinian land. The third chapter looks at direct collaborations between the state, the industrial military complex, and universities, considering scholars involvement in the development of new weapons, propaganda and military training, among other. The forth chapter explains how Israeli universities represses the academic freedom of Palestinian and anti-Zionist Israeli academic, essentially banning them from researching and speaking about some topics, e.g. the Nakba. The fifth chapter is an account of the ways Israel sought to prevent and regulate Palestinian access to higher education, through outright bans, entry requirements and policies designed to exclude Palestinians, or physically, by making it difficult for students to go to class through checkpoints, road closures or simply lack of transport. The sixth and final chapter focuses on the repression of Palestinian students in Israeli universities (through policy and policing), the West Bank (through military raids) and Gaza (through bombing).
This book is sinister and comforting at once, a combination I did not think was possible. Through details, and carefully chosen words, Shirley Jackson injects creepiness into the everyday, and coziness into the darkness. I grew to love the murderer, and will forever be scared of New England's small villages. I must admit that I read this book on a great holiday after a few, long months of hard work. So, the perfect situation to fall in love with a book. That said, I thought it was a little masterpiece.
This was a great book. The relationship between Veronica and the narrator is so 'real', loving and complicated, and I wish more books were so nuanced in describing (female) friendships. Every character in the book is fundamentally flawed. Almost everyone is also full of dignity and humanity. At times I wished the more lyrical and introspective parts were shorter, but the excellent writing, and the way they tie together with the rest, always 'brought them back' just in time for me to stick with it.
Maybe I'm being a little harsh, but I have reached my quota of stories about lads with a drug/alchool problems, and a crash on a girl who is just not so into them. A few stories stood out, and made the book more bearable: the title story, Tooth and Claw, Dogology, and Chicxulub.
Dahl is a great writer, and I grew up on his children books. Perhaps, that set the bar very high, and that's why the book didn't quite make it, for me. The stories are quirky and enjoyable, some more some less so, but didn't blow my mind. In a few instances, I'm afraid that the moral(ising) undertones that work fine in children stories were a bit too explicit for "adults". I enjoyed the two autobiographical pieces, Lucky Break and A Piece of Cake.
The Well of Loneliness is a great book to read for anyone interested in LGBT history, and European upper-class morality, but it is not a GOOD book. Not because it is classist, racist, homophobic (especially camp-phobic) and militarist - I understand moral standards and understandings of sexuality shift with time. Actually, it is a great chance to get a sense for the world views of a British aristocratic lady. But, there isn't much complexity, nor a desire to question moral judgements except those that directly affect Stephen. And, let's be honest, it is hard to write such a whiny book without being boring (even leaving aside the fact that Stephen's wealth gave her so many options that most lesbian/queer people didn't have).To my mind, there are two redeeming aspects to the book, both more evident in the first part - the one describing Stephen's growing up. First, the honesty and …
The Well of Loneliness is a great book to read for anyone interested in LGBT history, and European upper-class morality, but it is not a GOOD book. Not because it is classist, racist, homophobic (especially camp-phobic) and militarist - I understand moral standards and understandings of sexuality shift with time. Actually, it is a great chance to get a sense for the world views of a British aristocratic lady. But, there isn't much complexity, nor a desire to question moral judgements except those that directly affect Stephen. And, let's be honest, it is hard to write such a whiny book without being boring (even leaving aside the fact that Stephen's wealth gave her so many options that most lesbian/queer people didn't have).To my mind, there are two redeeming aspects to the book, both more evident in the first part - the one describing Stephen's growing up. First, the honesty and 'raw-ness' in the account of Stephen's tomboy childhood, and her feeling of not belonging. And, second, the description of Morton and the Midlands, which really conveyed the author's love for those places (and for the British class system, argh).
Let's be honest: this is NOT a good book. It is a bit shallow and manipulative as hell. Still, I could not give it less than three stars because I had a pretty good time reading it. By the end, I was sucked in into the story so much that I literally cried. It left me with the feeling I get after watching a 3-hour Hollywood love story on a sad, sunny Sunday afternoon. Sure, you COULD do something better with your time, but why should you?
The coming of age story of two sisters who have to deal with a series of difficulties and tragic events, including disfunctional parents, the sense of not belonging, sucide, alcholism. I enjoyed the strong women characters who populated this book, and especially Hyacinth, the girls' grandmother: hurt, wise, fierce. I also enjoyed the descriptions of Barbados, its food, towns, landscapes and people. The way the story and the characters developed, however, was a touch too predictable, leaving little room for tension, indecision, and lack of resolve, which would, in my view, added to the book. The bad guys are bad, the good guys (ladies) are good, and get even better as the book goes by. That being said, I liked it. I read most of it on a long plane journey, and, in that context, I appreciated that its straightforwardness, which made for an easy read, and a good travel …
The coming of age story of two sisters who have to deal with a series of difficulties and tragic events, including disfunctional parents, the sense of not belonging, sucide, alcholism. I enjoyed the strong women characters who populated this book, and especially Hyacinth, the girls' grandmother: hurt, wise, fierce. I also enjoyed the descriptions of Barbados, its food, towns, landscapes and people. The way the story and the characters developed, however, was a touch too predictable, leaving little room for tension, indecision, and lack of resolve, which would, in my view, added to the book. The bad guys are bad, the good guys (ladies) are good, and get even better as the book goes by. That being said, I liked it. I read most of it on a long plane journey, and, in that context, I appreciated that its straightforwardness, which made for an easy read, and a good travel companion.
I had tried reading The Shipping News once before and gave up - largely because I found it difficult to understand. I suspect that if I had a go at it a third time, I would give it five stars. I was past half of the book when I started to get used to the Newfoundland's language, inflection, and images. I still had to skim over maritime terms and entire sentences, and just give in to the story and the rhythm of Proulx's writing. In other words, even if I did not understand it, I could tell it was beautiful. Luckily, I did understand enough to follow the story, be charmed by it. Her characters are wonders, so imperfect and damaged and funny and brave and poetic. Needless to say, I'm a big fan of aunt Agnis. When I finished the last pages, in the heat of Jerusalem's summer, I …
I had tried reading The Shipping News once before and gave up - largely because I found it difficult to understand. I suspect that if I had a go at it a third time, I would give it five stars. I was past half of the book when I started to get used to the Newfoundland's language, inflection, and images. I still had to skim over maritime terms and entire sentences, and just give in to the story and the rhythm of Proulx's writing. In other words, even if I did not understand it, I could tell it was beautiful. Luckily, I did understand enough to follow the story, be charmed by it. Her characters are wonders, so imperfect and damaged and funny and brave and poetic. Needless to say, I'm a big fan of aunt Agnis. When I finished the last pages, in the heat of Jerusalem's summer, I found myself longing for a cup of steaming tea, with milk, and the sight of snow. I imagine this is a book you'll love or hate. If you are looking for something quick-paces and easy to read, pick something else. But if you can be patient, there is something magic about this book.
The sellout is very funny and very clever. Too much so: the ratio of jokes and references per page was so high, I had to come to terms with missing about 60% of them. Sure enough, not being a native speaker and having never lived in the US did not help. Not all was lost: the jokes I did get were funny indeed, sometimes even laugh-out-loud funny. Still, I enjoyed the most the parts were the writing got plainer, and I could sink into the plot, and the book's power satire of racism, its victims, its deniers, and its critics. Overall, I'm happy to have read the book, but happier that I've now finished it and can move on.
At a café table in Lahore, a bearded Pakistani man converses with an uneasy American stranger. As dusk deepens to …
Content warning Medium spoilers!
What would happen if women could overpower men - on a physical, violent level? The premise of this book is such an interesting one, I really wanted to love it. Instead, I find myself writing a mixed-feelings review, trying to shield Alderman from my own criticism.
My edition's cover declares it a mix between a The Hunger Games and Margaret Atwood - but I find that the book falls short in both of these comparisons. Even though it's written as an adventure book, aka a fast-paced plot in which a lot of stuff happens, it is not really a page-turner. It picks up a little towards the end, but generally speaking I did not loose sleep over what would happen. Arguably, that's because Alderman was trying to pack into the book a bit more social commentary than Suzanne Collins does. Yet, to my mind she did not manage to explore her initial hunch as fully and nuancedly as she could have done. Sexism is not just about physical strength, so what would the power to overpower men in a physical fight change? Would we really just have an upside-down world? Sexual violence is major theme of the book, perhaps because that's an example of things that could really just 'flip' (but would they? is it really that simple? isn't there a cultural dimension to rape, developed over millennia, that would be helpful to consider in more depth?). If trigger warnings are ever needed, this book definitely calls for one. Though I can guess what Alderman is trying to do by describing rape scenes rather graphically (i.e. bring home the point that that's already happening, in OUR world, to women), I'm not sure she needed to.